check_1_1_mksp_redundancy_status
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
check_1_1_mksp_redundancy_status [2020/05/15 13:54] – created walkeradmin | check_1_1_mksp_redundancy_status [2023/03/09 22:35] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Check 1+1 MKSP Redundancy Status | + | ====== |
+ | <color darkorange> | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ==== Introduction ==== | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | When using 1+1 Stream Processors (and for this example I am using 1+1 SP in Compact Mode). The 1+1 SP servers | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | There are several operations that the SPs are handling, and either SP can be the one doing an operation, these are: | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | StatMux | ||
+ | PSI | ||
+ | Scrambling CA | ||
+ | MUX | ||
+ | I am unsure of how tightly coupled these components are, i.e. do Mux and PSI always follow each other, I am unsure. StatMux and CA do seem to be quite independent though. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Please note - You must you the <color # | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | In a web browser, enter the following: | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | You will see an output in your browser similar to below (with different instance names) - <color # | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | { | ||
+ | mongo_status: | ||
+ | rabbit_status: | ||
+ | statmux: { | ||
+ | active: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ ] | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | inactive: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ] | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | psi: { | ||
+ | active: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ ] | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | inactive: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ] | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | mux: { | ||
+ | active: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ ] | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | inactive: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ] | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | simulcrypt: { | ||
+ | active: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ ] | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | inactive: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ] | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | In the output above we can see that <color # | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Now I will do a Mux switch from nCompass ESM. | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | { | ||
+ | mongo_status: | ||
+ | rabbit_status: | ||
+ | mux: { | ||
+ | active: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ] | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | inactive: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ ] | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | psi: { | ||
+ | active: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ] | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | inactive: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ ] | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | statmux: { | ||
+ | active: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ] | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | inactive: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ ] | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | simulcrypt: { | ||
+ | active: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ] | ||
+ | }, | ||
+ | inactive: { | ||
+ | SP01: [ | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | ], | ||
+ | SP02: [ ] | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | As we can see from above, all the mux components are now being handled by Mux2 (SPO2). | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | I have seen examples where some elements are being handled by one mux, and the remainder by the other mux. While it seems slightly odd that this happens, it is perfectly normal operation. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
check_1_1_mksp_redundancy_status.1589547298.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/03/09 22:35 (external edit)