interfaces_vswitches_and_port_groups
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
interfaces_vswitches_and_port_groups [2017/07/18 11:18] – walkeradmin | interfaces_vswitches_and_port_groups [2017/07/18 11:28] – walkeradmin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
+ | In the example below we can see that the third physical interface is connected to both VMs (the yellow lines) and both of these interfaces are in the same Port Group. This means we shared data between the two VMs using only a single port. | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
\\ | \\ | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | \\ | + | ==== Three Server Example ==== |
- | \\ | + | |
- | \\ | + | |
- | \\ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
Consider my example below, I three servers, all connected to a switch, and I am passing multicast traffice between them, that is being processed in a particular way at each stage. Basically I want an input, two processing stages, a storage device and an output. | Consider my example below, I three servers, all connected to a switch, and I am passing multicast traffice between them, that is being processed in a particular way at each stage. Basically I want an input, two processing stages, a storage device and an output. | ||
\\ | \\ |
interfaces_vswitches_and_port_groups.txt · Last modified: 2023/03/09 22:35 by 127.0.0.1